Sunday, January 22, 2023

Normalizing Relationships With Conspiracy Theorists Will Get People Killed

Today, in my daily email briefings from various media that I subscribe to, I received a short missive from Kate Woodsome of the Washington Post suggesting that I read an opinion piece by Sergio PeƧanha advocating that we "hug an election denier".


He told Kate “The radicalization doesn’t really drive me nuts — it just bores me. But I try to focus on the people for who they are.” In other words he doesn't care about their politics or the effects those politics have on others as he's unwilling to face these issues directly within his own family.

This is "normalization" of the violence and hateful rhetoric coming from the right wing. I was infuriated by what I read given the Post's tendency to downplay the effects of constant anti-transgender rhetoric and legislation so I wrote a response to Kate.

And no, I don't expect any sort of responsible response from Kate or the rest of the Post staff. It's 1933 all over again and the white majority in this country thinks everything is "Fine! Just fine!"

******************************


Sergio is not one of us who are being targeted as scapegoats by these conspiracy theorists. Sergio isn’t a transgender child being threatened with denial of medical care by these conspiracy theorists. Sergio isn’t someone being threatened with arrest for simply dressing in a manner consistent with their sense of gender identity. Sergio isn’t someone who conspiracy theory inspired politicians have even said “belong in camps” or who “should be rounded up and executed”.

As a trans woman I tire of these efforts to normalize this ongoing violence against people like myself just so YOU won’t have to engage directly with people who are openly proposing genocide against a small minority.

Tell me how I’m supposed to play nice with people who daily lie about those like myself, who daily stir up hatred and anger against trans people to the extent that the transgender murder rate is 300% higher than it was six years ago.

Advocating to overlook the violent hateful effects of the politics these people scream from the town halls is advocating to let that violence continue and to turn your backs on those being persecuted.

Sergio’s piece and your admiration for it are not just disappointing; they’re both disgusting and terrifying to the transgender community as we watch ourselves being relentlessly attacked by dozens of state governments while you, the major media, openly ignores what is happening.

I wonder when you or Sergio will finally find a voice to advocate for transgender people instead of those who preach violence against them. Or maybe you’ll both be “good little Germans” who stay quiet even as the ashes from death camps settle on your neighborhood so long as the trains run on time?

Disappointed doesn’t begin to describe how I feel about you or Sergio today but I suppose you don’t care about that so long as you and the rest of the Post staff can hug a fascist.


Sincerely,

Cara Ramsey


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/01/18/brazil-riot-conspiracy-theories/ 

Wednesday, November 9, 2022

2022 Wasn't About Defending Democracy

 A lot of people tried to argue that 2022 was going to be about defending democracy. Well, we've now seen how that turned out. But the truth is that 2022 was almost never going to be about defending democracy. At best, it was going to be a holding action against white supremacist patriarchy. And worse, it now appears that white supremacist patriarchy is about to outright win the US House of Representatives and might win the Senate.

This brings me to the real point I wanted to make here - your chance to defend democracy was in 2016, when so many of you hated a woman for the lies told about her that you let yourself be led to not vote for her. When freedom lost that election to an outright fascist, when control of the court was handed on a silver platter to Christian Nationalists, that was the end of democracy.

All the rest of this is the death and subsequent rotting of an already dead corpse of what used to be the hope that the US represented (but never really implemented). Until 2016, I think a large swath of Americans held onto a hope that things could get better, for people of color, for women, for LGBT people, for all minorities.

But after the election of a black president, the evil that is white supremacy felt threatened. And every election since then has been white supremacy reasserting itself. In the next 12 months, we will watch as a hyperconservative Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action. Don't be surprised if, in the following 2-3 years that same court allows segregation to be legalized again. Don't be surprised when LGBT people see marriage equality stripped away. Don't be surprised when women become less and less human beings and more and more just brood mares to the ruling conservatives.

And don't be surprised when the US becomes like Hungary or Russia, controlled by one hyperconservative theocratic fascist party (the GOP) while providing the illusion of democracy. Because Republicans have literally said that is their goal. The Republican governor candidate in Wisconsin, Tim Michels, promised that if he were elected, "Republicans will never lose another race in Wisconsin again". Just what did you think that meant?

Republican state legislatures across the nation have already passed laws allowing GOP controlled legislatures to overturn election results if they don't like the results of those elections. Those will get used in 2024. Be sure of it. Those laws were passed precisely because they didn't have the legal authority to do what Trump wanted in 2020 - overturn Biden's victory in GOP controlled states.

So let's stop pretending 2022 was about saving democracy. White people killed democracy in 2016 when they chose an openly racist, fascist thief and sexual predator over the most qualified person to run for the presidency in over a hundred years. If you thought defeating Clinton wouldn't hurt that bad, look around you, because I assure you, it's only going to get worse from here on out.

Monday, September 19, 2022

The Gender Critical Movement is Anti-Semitic

 The GOP is fully an anti-transgender organization now but you have to understand where the entire "gender critical" movement begins. Prepare to be shocked.


"In her new book, the Economist’s Helen Joyce claims the trans “global agenda” is “shaped” by three Jewish billionaires. The sourcing is vague in the book, but she has previously cited Jennifer Bilek. Bilek has previously cited an explicit Nazi. Gendercrit launders antisemitism."

The anti-trans movement is the same movement that screams about "mass immigration of third world countries to the west". And that movement completely blames Jewish people.

The anti-transgender "gender critical" movement is anti-Semitic at its core. It is fascist in the exact same sense, with the same attacks against LGBT people, as the fascist movements of the 1920's and 1930's.

So when you try to agree with the GOP attacking transgender people, calling them "groomers" and now "sick whacko leftists", you are engaged in supporting a completely anti-Semitic movement that wraps itself in fascism as a solution to everything.

The world has seen this entire play before. We know how much pain and suffering it will bring. If you ever wondered what you would do in the 1930's as fascism advanced in Germany, then stop and look around you - because what you are doing today to stop it or promote it is what you would have done then. Then look back and see how history judged the side you've chosen







Monday, October 18, 2021

Texas Becomes The Educational Partner of the KKK

 The GOP is turning the Texas education system into a propaganda arm of the KKK.

The GOP is a white nationalist, fascist movement intent on subverting and destroying democracy in the United States.

The GOP is the single greatest threat to the existence of the United States today.

The following post was made on Facebook by Heather Cox Richardson, a political historian, about what is happening to the Texas Education System. Why should you care? Texas is so large that its decisions often impact what textbook companies will put into textbooks, in order to get approved for sale in Texas.

*********************

Heather Cox Richardson

October 16, 2021 (Saturday)

On October 8, the executive director of curriculum and instruction for the Carroll Independent School District in Southlake, Texas, told a teacher to make sure to follow Texas’s new law requiring teachers to present opposing views on controversial subjects. The Carroll school board had recently reprimanded a fourth-grade teacher who had kept an anti-racism book in her classroom, and teachers wanted to know what books they could keep in their own classrooms.

“Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979,” the curriculum director said. “And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust,” the director continued, “that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.”

The Holocaust was Nazi Germany’s systematic murder of about two thirds of Europe’s Jewish population—about six million people—during World War II.

“How do you oppose the Holocaust?” one teacher said.

“Believe me,” the director said. “That’s come up.”

The Texas legislature passed another law that is going into effect in December. S.B. 3, known as the Critical Race Theory bill. It specifies what, exactly, social studies courses should teach to students. Those guidelines present a vision of how American citizens should perceive their nation.

They should have “an understanding of the fundamental moral, political, and intellectual foundations of the American experiment in self-government; the history, qualities, traditions, and features of civic engagement in the United States; the structure, function, and processes of government institutions at the federal, state, and local levels.”

But they should get that information in a specific way: through the Declaration of Independence; the United States Constitution; the Federalist Papers, including Essays 10 and 51; excerpts from Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America; the transcript of the first Lincoln-Douglas debate; and the writings of the founding fathers of the United States; the history and importance of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964; and the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Nineteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

While they managed to add in de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America—and I would be shocked if more than a handful of people have ever read that account of early America—there are some pointed omissions from this list. The Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees Black voting, didn’t make it, although the Nineteenth Amendment, which grants women the right to vote, did. Also missing is the Voting Rights Act of 1965, although the Civil Rights Act of the previous year is there.

Topics explicitly eliminated from the teaching standard are also instructive. Those things cut from the standards include: “the history of Native Americans,” and “[founding] mothers and other founding persons.”

Under “commitment to free speech and civil discourse,” topics struck from the standards include  “the writings of…George Washington; Ona Judge (a woman Washington enslaved and who ran away); Thomas Jefferson, Sally Hemings (the enslaved woman Jefferson took as a sexual companion after the death of his wife, her half-sister),” and “any other founding persons of the United States.”

The standards lost Frederick Douglass’s writings, the Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that forced Indigenous Americans off their southeastern lands, and Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists defending the separation of church and state. The standards lost “historical documents related to the civic accomplishments of marginalized populations” including documents related to the Chicano movement, women’s suffrage and equal rights, the civil rights movement, Indigenous rights, and the American labor movement.

The standards also lost “the history of white supremacy, including but not limited to the institution of slavery, the eugenics movement, and the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which it is morally wrong” and “the history and importance of the civil rights movement.” The legislature took three pages to outline all the things that teachers may not teach, including all the systemic biases the right associates with Critical Race Theory (although that legal theory is not taught in K–12 schools), and anything having to do with the 1619 Project.

Teachers cannot be forced to teach current events or controversial issues, but if they choose to do so, they must “strive to explore that topic from diverse and contending perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective.” Supporters of the measure said that teachers should teach facts and not “choose sides.”

The lawmakers who wrote the new standards said they had been crafted to eliminate redundancy. In 2019, the state wrote standards to teach character traits—courage, integrity and honesty—and instructions to include particular people or events could simply duplicate those concepts. “If you want to talk about courage, talk about George Washington crossing the Delaware, or William Barret Travis defending the Alamo,” a member of the state board of education said.

Editing from our history Dolores Huerta, who co-founded the National Farmworkers’ Association—she was eliminated by name—as well as Abigail Adams and Frederick Douglass and the 1924 Snyder Act (by which the nation recognized Indigenous citizenship) does more than whitewash our history. That editing warps what it means to be an American.

Our history is not about individual feats of courage or honesty in a vacuum. It is about the tireless efforts of people in this country from all backgrounds and all walks of life to determine their own fate and to elect a government that will support that ambition.  

A curriculum that talks about individual courage and integrity while erasing the majority of us, as well as the rules that enable us to have a say in our government by voting, is deliberately untethered from national democratic principles.

It gives us a school that does not dare take a position on the Holocaust.

Monday, September 13, 2021

The Question About Ivermectin and Male Infertility

Recently someone took issue with the claim that ivermectin causes fertility issues in men.

This first highlighted link shows a Netherlands journal discussing the 2011 study, but I'll be providing other links in this post as well.

Study: Ivermectin makes men infertile

The 2011 study in Nigeria found significant effects but in a small sample size. This, plus where the study was published were used to question the results of that study.

However, what else do we know about ivermectin and male fertility?


A 2008 study showed that ivermectin did produce fertility issues in male rats. The effects were compounded when ivermectin was combined with a second drug.

A similar study was repeated and published on September 7th, 2017, and concluded, again, ivermectin does have impacts on fertility of male rats and again that the effects were compounded with another drug.


Even Snopes refuses to mark this as "False" and instead labels the unfertility claim in human males as "Unproven".


One of the effects of ivermectin against mosquitos in pursuit of malaria control was significantly decreased egg production by surviving females. So, again, ivermectin is associated with a fertility problem (this time in females). This was from a peer-reviewed NIH study about livestock in pursuit of malaria elimination.

Administration of ivermectin to peridomestic cattle: a promising approach to target the residual transmission of human malaria


However, we also know that selenium administration in rats reduces the testicular dysfunction in rats.


The right conclusion here appears to be, as one science journal noted, caution about overprescribing ivermectin in humans, until more testing can be done. But the available facts demonstrate that ivermectin does cause fertility issues in various species other than humans and that caution ought to be taken with regard to human ingestion of ivermectin, especially unsupervised administration of ivermectin for purposes which it has no proven positive effects. In particular, ivermectin appears to interact with other drugs to cause other effects.


*****************



Saturday, February 6, 2021

The GOP is the Greatest Threat To America in the Last 150 years.

When Trump announced he was running in 2015, I knew that Trump would actively try to destroy our republic and its democratic institutions. I knew he would do this in 2015 because I knew, from years of watching, who and what Donald Trump was.

As this article demonstrates, a vast coalition, even including wealthy businessmen, came together not to defeat Donald Trump, but to ensure that we had free and fair elections, which Trump did not want because Trump is a tyrant.
 
Even the surviving Koch brother, himself a far right-wing propaganda expert and massive contributor to right-wing causes, did not want to be part of Trump's attempts to openly destroy democracy.
 
This was not a "shadow campaign" to me and other people who fought for fairer voting laws. We knew we were fighting a battle to save the very thing that made America into America - democratic FREE elections.
 
Trump was and IS a fucking tyrant. And, unfortunately, he's left behind a GOP that is now thoroughly radicalized on behalf of fascist policies.
 
It's no coincidence that Republicans now love Putin. Putin was the one who showed them how to put a thin veneer of democracy over top of a fascist oligarchy. Russia is not a real democracy and the events of the last two weeks should show that. And THAT is what Republicans want, because they know that their positions, largely based on white supremacy and bowing down to the rich, are very unpopular.
 
Democrats control the House but not by a wide margin yet those Democrats represent 60 million more people than Republicans do. The senate is split 50-50 yet Democratic senators represent 40 million more people than Republicans do. Republicans only rule where they rule by cheating, by gerrymandering, by suppressing the vote of minorities, by making voting unnecessarily hard, expensive, and troublesome. Republicans are tyrants!
 
In response to massive voter turnout, Republican states across the country are rushing to impose voter suppression laws because they can't win unless they cheat.
 
This is not Ike's GOP. It's not even Nixon's GOP anymore. It's a deeply radicalized fascist party that has seized control of the Republican name.
 
There's a reason that the Joe Walshes, George Wills, and so many other traditional Republicans are no longer Republicans.
 
The thing that calls itself the GOP today is the gravest threat to this nation in the last 150 years. Even more than Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, because those were external but this is internal and too many Americans refuse to realize that the GOP is now a party of tyranny.

 The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

 


Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Why Trump Followers Can Be Considered Cult Members

Some of you who follow me may be about to get angry. That's too bad because facts are facts.

There is a reason I call Trump followers cult members.






Normalizing Relationships With Conspiracy Theorists Will Get People Killed

Today, in my daily email briefings from various media that I subscribe to, I received a short missive from Kate Woodsome of the Washington P...